Fernando Leanme and Amedeo Abruzzo
Journal of Climate Science
Peripatetics
Ninety Seven Percent of expert scientists agree that human CO2
emissions are altering the world’s climate (Cook 2013), but segments of the
public stubbornly remain unconvinced by the scientific evidence (Lewandosky,
2012). Climate models provide a glimpse
of the future, and while they do not agree on all of the details, most models
predict a few general trends (Randall 2007). First, according to the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an increase of greenhouse gases in
the atmosphere will increase temperatures (IPCC 2013). More uncertain outcomes
of an increase in global temperatures include increased number of storms,
including mid-latitude tornadoes (Riebeek, 2005). According to a very complex study, in 2005, US$2 to US$14 billion of the recorded annual losses could be attributable to climate change (Estrada el al, 2015).
Tornadoes (abc.go.com)
Here we report the results of a data
manipulation used to derive what we term the “F” parameter or index, which can
be used to predict future tornado frequency increases as the earth warms. Paralleling previous work by Lewandoski, Cook,
and others, we have used a conception of free style conjoining of widespread parameters
we have selected to mathematically prove
what we did.
We additionally show that the
climate anomaly for the USA state of Missouri is a key player in tornado frequency
for the continental USA. This provides empirical confirmation of previous
suggestions that connecting temperature anomalies to other factors can yield
acceptance of science which will be strongly associated with the perception of
a consensus among scientists.
In our case we used the El Niño Southern
Oscillation Index, as reported by Mike
Daly, as well as the Hadley Center temperature anomaly data downloaded from Google Earth.
Missouri generally has a humid
continental climate (Köppen climate classification Dfa), with cool to cold
winters and long, hot summers. In the southern part of the state, particularly
in the Bootheel, the climate borders on a humid subtropical climate (Köppen
Cfa). Due to its location in the interior United States, Missouri often
experiences extremes in temperatures. Not having either large mountains or
oceans nearby to moderate its temperature, its climate is alternately
influenced by air from the cold Arctic and the hot and humid Gulf of Mexico
(Wikipedia 2014).
El Niño involves warming of the
eastern tropical Pacific Ocean (Bove 1999, Tisdale 2014). Here we base the
definition of an El Niño event as developed by Mike Daly in a graph we found
using google.
This was copied from the Bove paper:
“A tornado is rotating column of air usually accompanied by a funnel-shaped
downward extension of a cumulonimbus cloud and has destructive winds of up to
300 miles per hour (Rotunno, 1986). The United States has the largest number of
annual tornado events in the world, causing millions of dollars in property
damage and killing dozens of people annually (Grazulis 1991).”
Climatic data was collected from graphs
available in the Google Image Facility. The first study phase involved copying
the tornado frequency (Perry 2013). Figure 1, a skeptic version, shows the plot prepared to prove tornadoes
aren´t increasing. Monthly coefficients of variation can be as high as five
times the observed mean, and in the same order of magnitude of the average for
the complete data set.
Figure 1. USA Tornado Frequency
as
shown at Carpe Diem by Perry, 2013.
The evident lack of correlation
between the tendency seen in this graph and what we believed led us to discard
the raw data as seen above. At that point we were heavily influenced by the
following quote from the Huffington Post:
“Michael Mann, a climatologist who
directs the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University said
“If you’re a betting person — or the insurance or reinsurance industry, for
that matter — you’d probably go with a prediction of greater frequency and
intensity of tornadoes as a result of human-caused climate change.”” (Peeples
2013).
The next data manipulation step
involved obtaining the natural logarithm of the tornado frequency we obtained
from Perry 2013. As seen in Figure 2 below, the fourth order statistical regression
curve shows a decreasing tornado frequency. This too was judged unacceptable.
Figure 2. Natural logarithm of the
tornado frequency
versus Missouri temperature anomaly.
Here we must thank the Grantham Institute for giving us the
inspiration for our next steps. As their website says “The Grantham Institute
was founded with a mandate to drive forward climate change…” and in this they
do a really good job.
As mentioned above, ENSO is a very
important climate parameter, this led us to plot the ENSO Index and the
Missouri Temperature on the same plot, as seen below:
Figure 3. ENSO Index and Missouri
Temperature Anomaly
The figure shows these two data sets
wiggle with nearly identical statistical frequencies. The correlation index is
considered to be identical to that of tree ring width and temperature during
the second half of the 20th Century. ¨Stimulated, two photon Bragg
scattering was used for spectroscopic measurement¨ (Inouye PhD thesis 2001).
Considering statistical frequency
(which need not be confused with the frequency of a Bose Einstein condensate), the
procedure led to the subtraction of the Missouri Temperature Anomaly from the
ENSO Index (hereby known as the “F” Parameter). This is considered a valid
step, inspired by the following comment:
“With this method, the SST anomalies regressed with the Nino1+2 SST
index are removed from the total SST anomalies before an EOF analysis was
applied to obtain the spatial pattern of the CP ENSO.” (Kao and Yu 2009; Yu and
Kim 2010).
The next step was to perform a
colonoscopy on the data. During a colonoscopy, a long, flexible tube
(colonoscope) is inserted into the rectum. A tiny video camera at the tip of
the tube allows the practitioner to view the subject inside out (Mayo 2014).
The key to proper removal of the
previous trend was the use of the “F” Parameter instead of the actual
temperature anomaly. This allowed us to prove conclusively the connection
between the climate and tornado activity. A plot of the natural log of the
tornado activity versus the F parameter is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Natural log of tornado
frequency versus F Parameter
As seen in the figure, a sixth order
regression with R=0.189 proves conclusively that tornado activity will increase
as F Parameter increases. The equation, extrapolated to an F value of 3,
demonstrates as many as 1500 tornadoes could strike the United States if the
ENSO Index were to reach 5 when the Missouri
Temperature Anomaly approaches 2 degrees C.
The F Index is a representative
example of the new science of climatology and the teleconnection between scientific/political
objectives and subjective science. It is our sincere hope that Presidential
Science Advisor John P. Holdren uses these key findings to silence those who
wish to deny the enormous increase in tornado activity we may see (remember, up
to 1500 tornadoes per year are within the realm of possibility according to
this work).
We must fervently adhere to universal truth, as spoken by the 97 %, and avoid denialist
jargoneering, which reaches extremes such
as saying things like “it is brazen for zombie science to show up in
the White House” (Twitter by Pielke 2014).
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario